google-site-verification: google1c6a56b8b78b1d8d.html Ancient Giants

Thursday, September 5, 2013

8 Foot Giant Humans Uncovered in Berryville, Virginia

8 Foot Giant Humans Uncovered in Berryville, Virginia



Spoke burials or skeletons situated around a central figure is most prominent in the Ohio Valley burial mounds.  The giant skeletons found in Virginia are a likely extension of the Ohio Valley giants


THE NEW YORK TIMES, JUNE 8, 1924
INDIAN GRAVES YIELD
SHENANDOAH RELICS
      Flood waters near Berryville. Virginia unearth a 7 1/2 foot skeleton of an ancient human. Of course, when this human, to whom the bones belonged, was alive in the flesh he would have been more like 7 feet. 9 inches tall. Also, this skeleton like some others found in the same area had generally 2 to 3 times the mass as that of contemporary humans. The grave where the skeleton was found was centrally located amongst other graves, perhaps, testifying to the important position in society that the owner of these bones once held.
     Another find, much larger than the first, was on the farm of Felix McManus, near Berryville,Virginia This is supposed to be an old Indian cemetery, and the unearthing was done by floods when the Shenandoah River was unusually high. Practically the same sort of relics were found, including a tomahawk. The graves were grouped around a center one in which the skeleton measured seven and one-half feet.

Giant Human Sioux Skeletons Discovered Near Fond du Lac, Wisconsin


Giant Sioux Indians Discovered Near Fond du Lac, Wisconsin






Valentine Democrat Valentine, September 07, 1905

Giant Skeletons Found
     Two skeletons, each measuring more than 7 feet in length, were discovered Friday in a gravel pit in the forest near Fond du Lac, Wisconsin.  The skulls are as large as those of two ordinary persons and the thigh bones are almost six inches longer than those of a six foot man.





Sunday, August 25, 2013

Ancient Phoenician or Hebrew Found Within the Mayan Language

Ancient Phoenician or Hebrew Found Within the Mayan Language


           Did Phoenician Sailors Bring the Ancient Hebrew Language to South American Maya?


      The PhÅ“nicians apparently were the first nation in the Eastern Hemisphere to use a phonetic alphabet, the characters being regarded as mere signs for sounds. It is a curious fact that at an equally early date we find a phonetic alphabet in Central America amongst the Mayas of Yucatan, whose traditions ascribe the origin of their civilization to a land across the sea to the east. Le Plongeon, the great authority on this subject, writes: "One-third of this tongue (the Maya) is pure Greek. Who brought the dialect of Homer to America? or who took to Greece that of the Mayas? Greek is the off-spring of the Sanscrit. Is Maya? or are they coeval?" Still more surprising is it to find thirteen letters out of the Maya alphabet bearing most distinct relation to the Egyptian hieroglyphic signs for the same letters. It is probable that the earliest form of alphabet was hieroglyphic, "the writing of the Gods," as the Egyptians called it, and that it developed later in Atlantis into the phonetic. It would be natural to assume that the Egyptians were an early colony from Atlantis (as they actually were) and that they carried away with them the primitive type of writing which has thus left its traces on both]
 hemispheres, while the PhÅ“nicians, who were a sea-going people, obtained and assimilated the later form of alphabet during their trading voyages with the people of the west.
     One more point may be noticed, viz., the extraordinary resemblance between many words in the Hebrew language and words bearing precisely the same meaning in the tongue of the Chiapenecs—a branch of the Maya race, and amongst the most ancient in Central America. A list of these words is given in North Americans of Antiquity, p. 475.
     The similarity of language among the various savages races of the Pacific islands has been used as an argument by writers on this subject. The existence of similar languages among races separated by leagues of ocean, across which in historic time they are known to have had no means of transport, is certainly an argument in favour of their descent from a single race occupying a single continent, but the argument cannot be used here, for the continent in question was not Atlantis, but the still earlier Lemuria.